RESUMO
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a critical systemic complication caused by Bothrops envenoming, a neglected health problem in the Brazilian Amazon. Understanding the underlying mechanisms leading to AKI is crucial for effectively mitigating the burden of this complication. This study aimed to characterize the urinary protein profile of Bothrops atrox snakebite victims who developed AKI. We analyzed three groups of samples collected on admission: healthy subjects (controls, n = 10), snakebite victims who developed AKI (AKI, n = 10), and those who did not evolve to AKI (No-AKI, n = 10). Using liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, we identified and quantified (label-free) 1190 proteins. A panel of 65 proteins was identified exclusively in the urine of snakebite victims, with 32 exclusives to the AKI condition. Proteins more abundant or exclusive in AKI’s urine were associated with acute phase response, endopeptidase inhibition, complement cascade, and inflammation. Notable proteins include serotransferrin, SERPINA-1, alpha-1B-glycoprotein, and NHL repeat-containing protein 3. Furthermore, evaluating previously reported biomarkers candidates for AKI and renal injury, we found retinol-binding protein, beta-2-microglobulin, cystatin-C, and hepcidin to be significant in cases of AKI induced by Bothrops envenoming. This work sheds light on physiological disturbances caused by Bothrops envenoming, highlighting potential biological processes contributing to AKI. Such insights may aid in better understanding and managing this life-threatening complication.
RESUMO
Introduction The deaths from and morbidities associated with snakebites - amputations, loss of function in the limb, visible scarring or tissue damage - have a vast economic, social, and psychological impact on indigenous communities in the Brazilian Amazon, especially children, and represent a real and pressing health crisis in this population. Snakebite clinical and research experts have therefore proposed expanding antivenom access from only hospitals to include the community health centers (CHC) located near and within indigenous communities. However, there are no studies examining the capacity of CHCs to store, administer, and manage antivenom treatment. In response to this gap, the research team calling for antivenom decentralization developed and validated an expert-based checklist outlining the minimum requirements for a CHC to provide antivenom. Methods The objective of this study was thus to survey a sample of CHCs in indigenous territories and evaluate their capacity to provide antivenom treatment according to this accredited checklist. The checklist was administered to nurses and doctors from 16 CHCs, two per indigenous district in Amazonas/Roraima states. Results Our results can be conceptualized into three central findings: 1) most CHCs have the capacity to provide antivenom treatment, 2) challenges to capacity are human resources and specialized items, and 3) antivenom decentralization is feasible and appropriate in indigenous communities. Conclusion Decentralization would provide culturally and contextually appropriate care accessibility to a historically marginalized and underserved population of the Brazilian Amazon. Future studies should examine optimal resource allocation in indigenous territories and develop an implementation strategy in partnership with indigenous leaders. Beyond the indigenous population, the checklist utilized could be applied to community health centers treating the general population and/or adapted to other low-resource settings.
RESUMO
Background Currently, antivenoms are the only specific treatment available for snakebite envenoming. In Brazil, over 30% of patients cannot access antivenom within its critical care window. Researchers have therefore proposed decentralizing to community health centers to decrease time-to-care and improve morbidity and mortality. Currently, there is no evidence-based method to evaluate the capacity of health units for antivenom treatment, nor what the absolute minimum supplies and staff are necessary for safe and effective antivenom administration and clinical management. Methods This study utilized a modified-Delphi approach to develop and validate a checklist to evaluate the minimum requirements for health units to adequately treat snakebite envenoming in the Amazon region of Brazil. The modified-Delphi approach consisted of four rounds: 1) iterative development of preliminary checklist by expert steering committee; 2) controlled feedback on preliminary checklist via expert judge survey; 3) two-phase nominal group technique with new expert judges to resolve pending items; and 4) checklist finalization and closing criteria by expert steering committee. The measure of agreement selected for this study was percent agreement defined a priori as ≥75%. Results A valid, reliable, and feasible checklist was developed. The development process highlighted three key findings: (1) the definition of community health centers and its list of essential items by expert judges is consistent with the Brazilian Ministry of Health, WHO snakebite strategic plan, and a general snakebite capacity guideline in India (internal validity), (2) the list of essential items for antivenom administration and clinical management is feasible and aligns with the literature regarding clinical care (reliability), and (3) engagement of local experts is critical to developing and implementing an antivenom decentralization strategy (feasibility). Conclusion This study joins an international set of evidence advocating for decentralization, adding value in its definition of essential care items; identification of training needs across the care continuum; and demonstration of the validity, reliability, and feasibility provided by engaging local experts. Specific to Brazil, further added value comes in the potential use of the checklist for health unit accreditation as well as its applications to logistics and resource distribution. Future research priorities should apply this checklist to health units in the Amazon region of Brazil to determine which community health centers are or could be capable of receiving antivenom and translate this expert-driven checklist and approach to snakebite care in other settings or other diseases in low-resource settings.
RESUMO
The indigenous populations of Brazil present poor health indicators and a disproportionate prevalence and case-fatality rate of neglected tropical diseases, including snakebite envenomations (SBEs). This study aims to estimate access to medical care for SBEs and analyze the barriers that prevent victims from accessing healthcare in indigenous communities in two health districts located in the Western Brazilian Amazon.
RESUMO
Snakebites are a major public health problem in the Brazilian Amazon and may lead to local complications and physical deficiencies. Access to antivenom treatment is poorer in indigenous populations compared to other populations. In this study, we report three cases of long-term severe disabilities as a result of Bothrops atrox snakebites in indigenous children, according to the narratives of the parents. The three cases evolved to compartment syndrome, secondary bacterial infection and extensive necrosis. The cases are associated with delayed antivenom treatment due to very fragmented therapeutic itineraries, which are marked by several changes in means of transport along the route. The loss of autonomy at such an early stage of life due to a disability caused by a snakebite, as observed in this study, may deprive children of sensory and social experiences and of learning their future roles in the community. In common to all cases, there was precarious access to rehabilitation services, which are generally centralized in the state capital, and which leads to a prolonged hospitalization of patients with severe snakebite, and distances them from their territory and family and community ties. Prospective studies should be conducted in the Amazon that estimate the burden of disabilities from snakebites in order to formulate public policies for the treatment and rehabilitation of patients through culturally tailored interventions.
RESUMO
Background Snakebite envenoming (SBE) is a neglected tropical disease capable of causing both significant disability and death. The burden of SBE is especially high in low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to perform a geospatial analysis evaluating the association of sociodemographics and access to care indicators on moderate and severe cases of SBE in Brazil. Methods We conducted an ecological, cross-sectional study of SBE in Brazil from 2014 to 2019 using the open access National System Identification of Notifiable Diseases (SINAN) database. We then collected a set of indicators from the Brazil Census of 2010 and performed a Principal Component Analysis to create variables related to health, economics, occupation, education, infrastructure, and access to care. Next, a descriptive and exploratory spatial analysis was conducted to evaluate the geospatial association of moderate and severe events. These variables related to events were evaluated using Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression. T-values were plotted in choropleth maps and considered statistically significant when values were <-1.96 or >+1.96. Results We found that the North region had the highest number of SBE cases by population (47.83/100,000), death rates (0.18/100,000), moderate and severe rates (22.96/100,000), and proportion of cases that took more than three hours to reach healthcare assistance (44.11%). The Northeast and Midwest had the next poorest indicators. Life expectancy, young population structure, inequality, electricity, occupation, and more than three hours to reach healthcare were positively associated with greater cases of moderate and severe events, while income, illiteracy, sanitation, and access to care were negatively associated. The remaining indicators showed a positive association in some areas of the country and a negative association in other areas. Conclusion Regional disparities in SBE incidence and rates of poor outcomes exist in Brazil, with the North region disproportionately affected. Multiple indicators were associated with rates of moderate and severe events, such as sociodemographic and health care indicators. Any approach to improving snakebite care must work to ensure the timeliness of antivenom administration.
RESUMO
Background Scorpion stings in Brazil represent a major public health problem due to their incidence and their potential ability to lead to severe and often fatal clinical outcomes. A better understanding of scorpionism determinants is essential for a precise comprehension of accident dynamics and to guide public policy. Our study is the first to model the spatio-temporal variability of scorpionism across municipalities in São Paulo (SP) and to investigate its relationship with demographic, socioeconomic, environmental, and climatic variables. Methodology This ecological study analyzed secondary data on scorpion envenomation in SP from 2008 to 2021, using the Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation (INLA) to perform Bayesian inference for detection of areas and periods with the most suitable conditions for scorpionism. Principal findings From the spring of 2008 to 2021, the relative risk (RR) increased eight times in SP, from 0.47 (95%CI 0.43–0.51) to 3.57 (95%CI 3.36–3.78), although there has been an apparent stabilization since 2019. The western, northern, and northwestern parts of SP showed higher risks; overall, there was a 13% decrease in scorpionism during winters. Among the covariates considered, an increase of one standard deviation in the Gini index, which captures income inequality, was associated with a 11% increase in scorpion envenomation. Maximum temperatures were also associated with scorpionism, with risks doubling for temperatures above 36°C. Relative humidity displayed a nonlinear association, with a 50% increase in risk for 30–32% humidity and reached a minimum of 0.63 RR for 75–76% humidity. Conclusions Higher temperatures, lower humidity, and social inequalities were associated with a higher risk of scorpionism in SP municipalities. By capturing local and temporal relationships across space and time, authorities can design more effective strategies that adhere to local and temporal considerations.
RESUMO
Envenomation caused by venomous animals may trigger significant local complications such as pain, edema, localized hemorrhage, and tissue necrosis, in addition to complications such as dermonecrosis, myonecrosis, and even amputations. This systematic review aims to evaluate scientific evidence on therapies used to target local effects caused by envenomation. The PubMed, MEDLINE, and LILACS databases were used to perform a literature search on the topic. The review was based on studies that cited procedures performed on local injuries following envenomation with the aim of being an adjuvant therapeutic strategy. The literature regarding local treatments used following envenomation reports the use of several alternative methods and/or therapies. The venomous animals found in the search were snakes (82.05%), insects (2.56%), spiders (2.56%), scorpions (2.56%), and others (jellyfish, centipede, sea urchin—10.26%). In regard to the treatments, the use of tourniquets, corticosteroids, antihistamines, and cryotherapy is questionable, as well as the use of plants and oils. Low-intensity lasers stand out as a possible therapeutic tool for these injuries. Local complications can progress to serious conditions and may result in physical disabilities and sequelae. This study compiled information on adjuvant therapeutic measures and underscores the importance of more robust scientific evidence for recommendations that act on local effects together with the antivenom.
RESUMO
Remote areas, such as the Amazon Forest, face unique geographical challenges of transportation-based access to health services. As transportation to healthcare in most of the Amazon Forest is only possible by rivers routes, any travel time and travel distance estimation is limited by the lack of data sources containing rivers as potential transportation routes. Therefore, we developed an approach to convert the geographical representation of roads and rivers in the Amazon into a combined, interoperable, and reusable dataset. To build the dataset, we processed and combined data from three data sources: OpenStreetMap, HydroSHEDS, and GloRiC. The resulting dataset can consider distance metrics using the combination of streets and rivers as a transportation route network for the Amazon Forest. The created dataset followed the guidelines and attributes defined by OpenStreetMap to leverage its reusability and interoperability possibilities. This new data source can be used by policymakers, health authorities, and researchers to perform time-to-care analysis in the International Amazon region.
RESUMO
In the Brazilian Amazon, deaths and disabilities from snakebite envenomations (SBEs) are a major and neglected problem for the indigenous population. However, minimal research has been conducted on how indigenous peoples access and utilize the health system for snakebite treatment. A qualitative study was conducted to understand the experiences of health care professionals (HCPs) who provide biomedical care to indigenous peoples with SBEs in the Brazilian Amazon. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were carried out in the context of a three-day training session for HCPs who work for the Indigenous Health Care Subsystem. A total of 56 HCPs participated, 27 in Boa Vista and 29 in Manaus. Thematic analysis resulted in three key findings: Indigenous peoples are amenable to receiving antivenom but not to leaving their villages for hospitals; HCPs require antivenom and additional resources to improve patient care; and HCPs strongly recommend a joint, bicultural approach to SBE treatment. Decentralizing antivenom to local health units addresses the central barriers identified in this study (e.g., resistance to hospitals, transportation). The vast diversity of ethnicities in the Brazilian Amazon will be a challenge, and additional studies should be conducted regarding preparing HCPs to work in intercultural contexts.
RESUMO
Background In the Brazilian Amazon, snakebite envenomings (SBE) disproportionately affect indigenous peoples. Communication between indigenous and biomedical health sectors in regards to SBEs has never been explored in this region. This study aims to build an explanatory model (EM) of the indigenous healthcare domain for SBE patients from the perspective of the indigenous caregivers. Methodology/Principal findings This is a qualitative study involving in-depth interviews of eight indigenous caregivers who are representatives of the Tikuna, Kokama and Kambeba ethnic groups, in the Alto Solimões River, western Brazilian Amazon. Data analysis was carried out via deductive thematic analysis. A framework was built containing the explanations based on three explanatory model (EM) components: etiology, course of sickness, and treatment. To indigenous caregivers, snakes are enemies and present conscience and intention. Snakebites have a natural or a supernatural cause, the last being more difficult to prevent and treat. Use of ayahuasca tea is a strategy used by some caregivers to identify the underlying cause of the SBE. Severe or lethal SBEs are understood as having been triggered by sorcery. Treatment is characterized by four components: i) immediate self-care; ii) first care in the village, mostly including tobacco smoking, chants and prayers, combined with the intake of animal bile and emetic plants; iii) a stay in a hospital, to receive antivenom and other treatments; iv) care in the village after hospital discharge, which is a phase of re-establishment of well-being and reintroduction into social life, using tobacco smoking, massages and compresses to the affected limb, and teas of bitter plants. Dietary taboos and behavioral interdictions (avoiding contact with menstruating and pregnant women) prevent complications, relapses, and death, and must be performed up to three months after the snakebite. Caregivers are in favor of antivenom treatment in indigenous areas. Conclusions/Significance There is a potential for articulation between different healthcare sectors to improve the management of SBEs in the Amazon region, and the aim is to decentralize antivenom treatment so that it occurs in indigenous health centers with the active participation of the indigenous caregivers.
RESUMO
Snakebite envenoming is currently considered a neglected tropical disease, which affects over 5 million people worldwide, and causes almost 150 000 deaths every year, as well as severe injuries, amputations and other sequelae. Snakebite envenoming in children, although proportionally less frequent, is generally more severe, and represents an important challenge for pediatric medicine, since they often result in worse outcomes. In Brazil, given its ecological, geographic and socioeconomic characteristics, snakebites are considered an important health problem, presenting approximately 30 000 victims per year, approximately 15% of them in children. Even with low snakebite incidence, children tend to have higher snakebite severity and complications due to the small body mass and same venom volume inoculated in comparison to adults, even though, due to the lack of epidemiological information about pediatric snakebites and induced injuries, it is difficult to measure the treatment effectiveness, outcomes and quality of emergency medical services for snakebites in children. In this review, we report how Brazilian children are affected by snakebites, describing the characteristics of this affected population, clinical aspects, management, outcomes and main challenges.
RESUMO
With the advancements in therapeutics and available treatment options, almost all deaths and permanent disabilities from snakebite envenoming (SBE) are preventable. The challenge lies in implementing these evidence-based treatments and practices across different settings and populations. This study aims to compare data on provider perceptions of SBE care across health systems and cultural contexts to inform potential implementation science approaches. We hypothesize different health systems and cultural contexts will influence specific perceived needs to provide adequate snakebite care within central tenets of care delivery (e.g., cost, access, human resources). We previously conducted exploratory descriptive studies in the US and Brazil in order to understand the experience, knowledge, and perceptions of health professionals treating SBE. In the US, in-depth interviews were performed with emergency physicians from January 2020 to March 2020. In BR, focus group discussions were conducted with health professionals from community health centers at the end of June 2021. The focus group discussions (BR) were originally analyzed through an inductive thematic analysis approach. We conducted a secondary qualitative analysis in which this codebook was then applied to the interviews (US) in a deductive content analysis. The analysis concluded in August 2022. Brazil participants were physicians (n=5) or nurses (n=20) from three municipalities in the State of Amazonas with an average of three years of professional experience. US participants were emergency physicians (n=16) with an average of 15 years of professional experience. Four main themes emerged: 1) barriers to adequate care on the patient and/or community side and 2) on the health system side, 3) perceived considerations for how to address SBE, and 4) identified needs for improving care. There were 25 subthemes within the four themes. These subthemes were largely the same across the Brazil and US data, but the rationale and content within each shared subtheme varied significantly. For example, the subtheme “role of health professionals in improving care” extended across Brazil and the US. Brazil emphasized the need for task-shifting and -sharing amongst health care disciplines, whereas the US suggested specialized approaches geared toward increasing access to toxicologists and other referral resources. Despite similar core barriers to adequate snakebite envenoming care and factors to consider when trying to improve care delivery, health professionals in different health systems and sociocultural contexts identified different needs. Accounting for, and understanding, these differences is crucial to the success of initiatives intended to strengthen snakebite envenoming care. Implementation science efforts, with explicit health professional input, should be applied to develop new and/or adapt existing evidence-based treatments and practices for SBE.
RESUMO
Amidst the global healthcare landscape, the menace of snakebite envenoming (SBE) has persisted, silently afflicting millions and annually claiming tens of thousands of lives. Indeed, in 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) reclassified snakebite envenoming as a Category A Neglected Tropical Disease (NTD), finally prompting worldwide recognition of the profound health and economic devastation caused by these venomous encounters. Then, in 2019, WHO unveiled an ambitious strategy: to slash snakebite envenoming-related mortality and disability by 50% before 2030 [1,2]. This editorial marks the inception of our Special Issue, “Snakebite Clinics and Pathogenesis: From Preclinical to Resource Mapping Studies”, which stands as a guiding light in our collective effort to confront SBEs. Gathering insights from research on snakebite envenoming outcomes, diagnostic advancements, uncommon case reports, therapeutic strategies, and healthcare professional training, this Special Issue is dedicated to disseminating knowledge and charting a course towards a future where snakebite envenomings cease to be a neglected tragedy and evolve into a preventable and manageable challenge. In their pioneering study, Murta et al. [3] explored the experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) providing medical care to indigenous people with SBEs in the Brazilian Amazon. They conducted group discussions during a three-day training session for HCPs from the Indigenous Health Care Subsystem, involving 56 participants split between Boa Vista (Roraima) and Manaus (Amazonas), which are state capitals located in the Brazilian Amazon Forest. The study revealed three key findings: indigenous people are open to receiving antivenom but prefer not to leave their villages for hospitals; HCPs require antivenom and additional resources to improve patient care; and HCPs advocate for a collaborative, culturally sensitive approach to SBE treatment. To address these challenges, the study suggests decentralizing antivenom distribution to local health units. However, the diverse ethnicities in the Brazilian Amazon pose a challenge, necessitating further research on preparing HCPs for intercultural contexts. Even when antivenom is available in low-resource areas, health workers do not receive adequate training to manage SBEs. The study of Rocha et al. (2022) [4] aimed to develop and validate a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for SBE management across Brazil. Content validation was performed by a panel of expert judges with academic and/or technical expertise in SBE management, and semantic validation was performed by analyzing focus group discussions with doctors and nurses from three municipalities of the Brazilian Amazon. This study presents the successful development and validation process of a CPG for SBE management, which is targeted to a specific low-resource, high-burden setting. This development and validation process can be adapted to other settings and/or other neglected tropical diseases. In the health system domain, this strategy involves ensuring the production and distribution of safe and effective antivenom treatment and strengthening local health systems. Bhatia et al. (2022) [5] highlight that there is an urgent need to replace the excessive use of animals in snake antivenom production. We tested the efficacy of a single batch of polyvalent antivenom from bioproducts limited to Echis carinatus venom collected from Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Rajasthan, using different in vitro assays. The use of both binding and functional assays allowed us to measure the efficacy of the antivenom. By normalizing the scale of measurements of the neutralization capacity of the Indian polyvalent antivenom using different in vitro assays, we were able to arrive at an efficacy score for Echis carinatus venoms that could be used to predict the ED50. This approach captures the variation in venom toxins shown by snake species and paves the way to replace the use of mice for evaluating antivenom potency. Protobothrops mucrosquamatus snakebites are frequent in Taiwan, and the species’ widespread distribution and diverse habitats drove Chiang et al. (2022) [6] to investigate envenoming effects and relevant venom variations. The results showed minor differences in the protein family, with variations in acidic phospholipases A2s, serine proteinases, metalloproteinases, C-type lectin-like proteins, and other less abundant components. Moreover, clinical manifestations of envenomed patients hospitalized in northern Taiwan revealed differences in local symptoms, such as ecchymosis and blistering. The mechanism of these local effects is probably related to the venom components’ geographical variability. These findings will help to improve the management of P. mucrosquamatus bites in Taiwan. Vera-Palacios et al. (2022) [7] investigated in vivo the ability of Urospatha sagittifolia (Araceae) to modulate the catalytic activity of Bothrops atrox venom, and their toxic consequences, such as edema, skin hemorrhage, and lethality. Ethanolic extract, which is rich in phenolics, alkaloids, coumarins, and flavonoids, reduced these three parameters. The authors concluded that these findings will support future studies with purified metabolites as new agents for the treatment of B. atrox snakebites, an important public health problem in the Amazon region. The study by Manson et al. [8] marks a groundbreaking leap forward in the realm of SBE treatment, with a particular focus on combating the toxicity of Three-Finger Toxins (3FTxs) of Naja ashei snake venom. These potent venom-derived toxins are prevalent in N. ashei venom and have posed a formidable challenge to effective antivenom therapy. What sets this research apart is the development of monoclonal antibodies (i.e., P4G6a, P6D9a, and P6D9b) meticulously designed to target these troublesome 3FTxs. Remarkably, the monoclonal antibodies demonstrated exceptional binding capabilities to the target 3FTxs, outperforming even the leading commercial antivenoms available in the Kenyan market. The true breakthrough lies in the combined use of these monoclonal antibodies, where their cocktail exhibited superior toxin inhibition compared to traditional antivenoms. Alsolaiss et al. [9] sheds essential light on the complex and diverse acute responses triggered by African snake venoms, a critical aspect of understanding the pathophysiology of SBEs. Using a well-designed murine model, the research systematically evaluated the acute-phase and inflammatory reactions induced by ten different African snake venoms, with a particular focus on sub-Saharan African species, including the spitting cobra (Naja nigricollis) and forest cobra (N. melanoleuca), as potent inducers of acute-phase and inflammatory responses, with N. nigricollis venom stimulating a remarkable 100-fold increase in systemic interleukin 6 (IL-6). Moreover, the study revealed species-specific changes in red blood cell morphology, lymphopenia, neutrophil leukocytosis, and marked hemolysis and platelet aggregation levels in response to these venoms. These findings underscore the intricate and diverse nature of acute responses to envenoming, paving the way for potential diagnostic and therapeutic advancements that could greatly benefit snakebite victims. A very interesting review was also presented in the Special Issue. Huang et al. [10] analyzes 35 cases of snakebites, primarily from front-fanged snakes, like vipers and cobras, as well as a few rare instances from rear-fanged snakes. Viper bites often result in severe complications, such as ischemic strokes and intracranial hemorrhages, leading to fatalities in some cases. In contrast, elapid bites are primarily manifested as neural, cardiac, and ophthalmic disorders. Remarkably, rear-fanged snakebites, characterized by shallow bites and minimal venom injection, rarely cause severe complications. An essential takeaway from the review is the pivotal role of antivenom (AV) treatment, although it also discusses various therapeutic agents that could potentially complement AV treatment for snakebite-induced complications. Furthermore, the Special Issue delved into two unconventional snakebite case reports, one conducted in Romania and the other in Brazil, subjecting them to comprehensive examination and discussion. Nitescu et al. [11] offers a unique perspective on snake envenomation, focusing on a specific exception within the European viper (Vipera berus) species. While most V. berus bites typically lack neurotoxic effects, their study highlights rare cases involving subspecies found in the Carpathian Basin of southeastern Europe that do induce such symptoms. The study presents a compelling case of a 5-year-old girl from southern Romania who experienced neurotoxicity, alongside systemic and local symptoms, following a bite from one of these Carpathian Basin V. berus subspecies. This case provides pivotal insights, affirming that venom from V. berus subspecies in the Carpathian Basin region can indeed induce neurotoxic effects. Additionally, it underscores the effectiveness of monospecific antivenom treatment in rapidly and completely mitigating the envenomation’s effects, offering valuable clinical guidance for the management of such rare cases. In contrast, Oliveira et al.’s [12] case report delves into the often-overlooked long-term musculoskeletal disabilities resulting from snakebites in indigenous communities in Brazil. The report focuses on a 32-year-old male indigenous patient envenomed by a Bothrops species (lancehead snake), highlighting the significant and enduring health challenges posed by snakebites. Over approximately 2 years and 6 months, the patient underwent various medical interventions, including debridement, tissue reconstruction, and physical therapy, resulting in improved mobility but a lasting impact on his gait. This case report emphasizes the need for a comprehensive healthcareapproach, including physiotherapy, plastic surgery, orthopedics, and social support, to aid in the reintegration of snakebite survivors into their communities. Antivenom treatments for SBE patients have existed for more than 130 years, remaining the only therapeutics available for this neglected problem. Remarkably, despite advances in the health system, access to antivenom treatment is poor in most areas of low-income countries. Better logistics for the transportation of antivenoms and other commodities is an issue to be addressed, as well as realistic and comprehensive health programs. In parallel, many investments are still needed for the research and development of more effective antivenoms for some species of snakes, as well as for the advance of small-molecule inhibitor-based drug therapies.
RESUMO
Scorpion envenomation is a public health problem in several tropical and subtropical countries. Tityus serrulatus Lutz and Mello, 1922 (Brazilian yellow scorpion) are responsible for approximately 150,000 envenoming cases per year in Brazil, of which 10% require antivenom treatment to reverse life-threatening venom effects. Therefore, thousands of T. serrulatus individuals are maintained under controlled captivity conditions for venom extraction, subsequently used in the production of the national supply of scorpion antivenom. Instituto Butantan is the main antivenom-manufacturing laboratory in Brazil, providing about 70,000 vials of scorpion antivenom for the Brazilian health system. Thus, the husbandry protocols and venom extraction methodologies are key points for the success of large-scale, standardized venom production. The objective of this article is to describe the captivity protocols of T. serrulatus husbandry, encompassing the husbandry routine and the venom extraction procedures, following good manufacturing practices, and ensuring animal welfare. These practices allow for the maintenance of up to 20,000 animals in captivity, with a routine of 3,000 to 5,000 scorpions milked monthly according to antivenom manufacturing demand, achieving an average of 90% of positive extraction.
